The Daily Telegraph has a disturbing report about an alleged compulsory plan to insert RFID microchip transponders in all dogs in the UK, and Yet Another National Database of human names, addresses and telephone numbers, which will not solve the underlying problems, and which will pose a Privacy and Security risk to millions of innocent people.
All dogs to be microchipped with owner’s details to ‘help track pets’
All dogs in Britain will be fitted with microchips which contain their owner’s details, under cross party plans designed to track family pets.
By Andrew Hough
Published: 7:00AM BST 28 Sep 2009
Owners will be forced to install the microchip containing a barcode that can store their pet’s name, breed, age and health along with their own address and phone number.
barcode ? Surely not ! How exactly do you read one of those opticaly, when it is implanted under the skin and fur ?
Presumably the author means an implantable RFID transponder chip
This sort of glass encapsulated RFID transponder chip implant, designed for animal tagging, uses a low frequency of around 125KHz, with a reading range of about a metre. High or microwave frequency, faster data rate, longer range RFIDchips etc. are of no use for implants, as those radio frequencies are strongly absorbed by living tissue.
The barcode’s details would then be stored on a national database which local councils could access in a bid to easily identify an owner’s pet.
What is the justification for this being a national database ? Read the rest of this entry »